Family: Microhylidae - Narrow-mouthed Frogs
Order: Anura - Frogs and Toads
Class: Amphibia
Phylum: Chordata - Vertebrates
Kingdom: Animalia
Red List status: Least Concern

Mossman south to Bluewater Range, Queensland, Australia
Adult:
Physically highly variable, easy to confuse with other Cophixalus
species without a call recording. Base colour ranges grey to brown. There is
commonly a dark W marking on the upper back and sometimes a narrow or
broad stripe down the middle of the back. Commonly there are paired
dark-edged yellow ovals towards the rear, at the sides of the
dorsum. There is a pale
blotch above the groin. The belly is spotted grey to brown. The digits are
unwebbed and toe discs
are large. The toe disc on the third finger is larger than that on
the fourth toe.

Eggs: Large, pale eggs laid in a terrestrial clutch beneath leaf
litter or moss.
Call: A short 'beep' (Queensland Museum 2000).
Similar species: Most other Cophixalus species are smaller. The fully-expanded toe discs distinguish this species from C. infacetus. At lower altitudes and towards the southern end of its range, C. ornatus is often the only member of the genus present.
Rainforest, occasionally extending into adjacent wet eucalypt woodland.
Elevation: 0-1,500 m
During the day, animals shelter beneath cover objects such as rocks and logs.
Courtship: Individuals typically call from vegetation 1-2 m above ground, occasionally wedged between branches (see photo), and only occasionally from the ground. Subsequent courtship has been observed in this species alone among Australian microhylids, though is expected to be similar in other species. Once a gravid female has been attracted by a male's mating call, the male issues a high-pitched call that he uses to lead the female along the ground to a hole in the substrate or a crevice between rocks. The 'leading call' is higher-pitched than the typical mating call; a further call, described by Hoskin (2004) as "squelching", may advertise arrival at the nest site. Females select mates based on the quality of their nests, which appears to be related to their depth and their distance from the calling site. Males have been recorded leading females to nest sites via a circuitous route if the straight distance to the nest site is too short.
Parental care: As in other members of the genus, nest attendance in this species has been documented. In one recorded instance, the male attendant partially consumed the clutch he was guarding, before moving half the remaining eggs to a moister patch and abandoning the others, which failed to hatch. Nest attendants appear to prey largely on ants which might otherwise threaten survival of the clutch.
Breeding biology: This species exhibits the largest clutch size known from an Australian microhylid, with one male recorded guarding a clutch of 22 eggs (Hoskin, 2004). The smallest recorded clutch size is 11. A string of eggs is laid terrestrially in a terrestrial nest. Eggs then undergo direct development into froglets, without an aquatic tadpole stage.
Hero, J-M., Hoskin, C. and Retallick, R. 2004.
Cophixalus ornatus. In: IUCN 2008.
2008 IUCN
Red List of Threatened Species
Hoskin, C. (2004) Australian microhylid frogs (Cophixalus
and Austrochaperina): phylogeny, taxonomy, calls, distributions and
breeding biology, Australian Journal of Zoology 52: 237-269
Wildlife of Tropical North Queensland
The Queensland Museum 2000